Sunday, June 20, 2010

Raavanan

The only way to see Raavanan is to look at it from the context of Ramayanam. Not that Mani ever lets forget you and in not so subtle ways let me add. Vikram screams pathu thalai often,  karthik jumps around for no reason save this reminder deal and so on. But even then when the subversion happens between the good and bad, it just seems a literal transfer - not a blurring of line between evil and good as the promotions claimed rather a total role reversal. Especially we have only see the gangster/mafia/anti hero in the good light like .. wait at least a few times(across various languages) EVERY year since God father released(i,e *35!), this role reversal doesn't register in one's head.

In the versions of Ramayan I have heard, Raavan was always described a good ruler, a great devotee - his only crime falling for another man's wife and keeping her captive for that reason.  With that if you transfer the evil act to other side, what could be the point of debate? Are we supposed to act surprised that this police officer - he is supposed to Ram and all but nothing gets defined in that way except for couple of dialogues proclaiming him so and character being called Dev isnt really on the good side?

And what was the 10 head deal? - he doesnt seem to be confusing at all, he seems the straightforward antihero - the typical Good guy on the wrong side of the law.

When Sachu Kichu was really small, Solomon Papaiah and team will some time take a break from their mamiyar/marmagala, nathanar/maithanara type patti mandrams and have Ram/Raavan or Sita's agni pareeksha debate which used to be lot lot more intense than this film. For any one who has seen this sort of patti mandram would know what an insult this is. 

If you take away the ramayan angle, there isnt anything left at all. At the climax, there was a possibility of starting the film through questions in Ragini's mind but that door is just shut abruptly with focus just on Veera so you are confused as to what the deal at all was.

So we are left with Vikram's nuanced performance carefully averting the over the top tag even though he stands dangerously on the edge, very good looking ash but whose age just shows through the climax scenes esp. next to Prithviraj and decently looking prithvi(he hasnt looked this good in any of his films) and overall great performances - the expected deal in Mani's movies. But there are lot of other expectations that Mani has never ever failed on and falters for the very first time. And here I went expecting something better than Kannathil Muthamittal and Iruvar so that he can wash off the memories of Guru and Yuva, now I will just watch Guru.

14 comments:

  1. Oh no!! :--((
    So I can give it a skip??

    ReplyDelete
  2. expectation is the killer ;)

    ReplyDelete
  3. SK: that is a exceedingly difficult question to answer, how can anyone sskip a mani movie?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Praveen & Gradwolf:
    Well, as Thalaivar(i mean mani here) himself once said, it is quite natural to have expectations when i go to a mani's movie

    ReplyDelete
  5. Praveen: thanks for the link as usual

    but my problem i dont think was with the expectation.

    As I had mentioned, the evil just got completely shifted, Ram and Raavan got interchanged - not a slight mix of right and wrong, it was a complete role reversal - which doesnt make any difference to me. my loyality wasnt with the name of Ram, it was with the path/ cause. So, I just didnt feel any surprise or anything even intersting in terms of a story line. This thought/question entered my head post interval and wouldnt just leave, so had a tough time empathizing with mani.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sachitha,
    I concur with you. It is not just about expectations. To me, it was the lack of story. If Mani had found a way of twisting the original Ramayan, instead of just making someone like Veerapan( burning policemen) as a hero, I would have been very impressed.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Somehow I liked the movie. It was a good watch personally (compared to other bollywood fare like Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi or Kites yada yada). But then I suppose we have all come to expect totally different, unexpected fare from Mani Ratnam that, an average flick from him is raped like anything by the critics...:)

    ReplyDelete
  8. I guess it was too much expectation build-up..shittier movies have gotten better reviews. Rajneeti comes to mind. And people were looking for a more straight-forward rip-off of Ramayan, which they did not get.

    I thought the first half was boring, but the second half was real good, and I really liked the ending. There was ambiguity in what both Ragini and Dev felt, which was left open to your judgement, which I liked too :)

    The movie just did not live up to the hype it created.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Viswajith.k.n:
    err.. Mani is in his own league, there is no comparison to other track.
    Kaushik Narasimhan:
    Rajneethi isnt good you say? should I drop watching it even in DVD plan?
    "There was ambiguity in what both Ragini and Dev felt" - but there just wasnt enough time to explore that you know, it was hardly five minutes. somewhere along, i should have atleast been taken along Ragini's journey - this wasnt enough.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Oh! you can give it a watch on DVD...It has some moments: The Kunti meeting Karna scene is so hilarious, it is a self-spoof!
    You can play spot the Mahabharat character
    You can play spot the Godfather scene game

    (if you are upto drinking games that is!)

    Rajneeti was crap.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Rajneeti was an OK entertainer actually. worth watching on internet..:D the worst in the recent past for me was Kites actually...torture max adhu...

    ReplyDelete
  12. Shoba: yep. "Mani had found a way of twisting the original Ramayan" this was nowhere.
    Kaushik: so no rajneethi for teetotalers, then?:)
    Viswajith.k.n: kites - trailer leye therinjadhu.

    ReplyDelete